> I ran into people at NASA who use Python because (beside being a good > language) it isn't GPL. Pure paranoia. You don't have to share the code that is written IN Python. Only modifications TO python (if it were GPL) > For legal and security reason they cannot > share changes to code they make, so anything GPL is unusable. > So are programs that run on Linux required to be open source? I need > to know. You may only shared link to GPL'ed packages, and the rest is up to you. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Drew Eckhardt
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Wes Peters
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Alex Belits
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Warner Losh
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Peter Seebach
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Alex Belits
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Peter Seebach
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Matt Dillon
- RE: FreeBSD vs. Linux, Solaris, and NT SteveB
- Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux, Solaris, and NT Warner Losh
- Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux, Solaris, and NT Marco van de Voort
- Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux, Solaris, and NT Neil Blakey-Milner
- RE: FreeBSD vs. Linux, Solaris, and NT mouss
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Warner Losh
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Alex Belits
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Warner Losh
- Re: licenses (no long Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, an... Wes Peters
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Alex Belits
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Wes Peters
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Warner Losh
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Matt Dillon