In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "SteveB" writes: : Since when is a product required to be open source to run on Linux? My : understanding was if an product was developed using GPL'd code or : libraries then that product is required to offer source. But just an : application running on Linux, that will kill Linux. It isn't. We were specifically talking about device drivers that are linked into the Linux kernel. : So are programs that run on Linux required to be open source? I need : to know. No. Normal programs are not, unless, as you say, they use code that requires otherwise. That part is believed to be safe, even by the more paranoid attorneys that I've talked to. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Dennis
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Drew Eckhardt
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Wes Peters
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Alex Belits
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Warner Losh
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Peter Seebach
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Alex Belits
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Peter Seebach
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Matt Dillon
- RE: FreeBSD vs. Linux, Solaris, and NT SteveB
- RE: FreeBSD vs. Linux, Solaris, and NT Warner Losh
- RE: FreeBSD vs. Linux, Solaris, and NT Marco van de Voort
- Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux, Solaris, and NT Neil Blakey-Milner
- RE: FreeBSD vs. Linux, Solaris, and NT mouss
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Warner Losh
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Alex Belits
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Warner Losh
- Re: licenses (no long Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, an... Wes Peters
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Alex Belits
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Wes Peters
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Warner Losh