Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT

[Drew Eckhardt]

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
m writes:
>Yes but most commercial uses take advantage of the binary distribution 
>capability of the BSD license AFTER they've poured their corporate dollars 
>into enhancements. With linux you have to give your work away, making it 
>much less useful.

To be pedantic, you only need to provide source for works derived 
from GPL'd software which in this case means the kernel propper. User 
land applications and device drivers may be shipped in binary-only 
form because they are separate works, even when distributed in 
aggregation with GPL'd software.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message