Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT

[Warner Losh]

Drew Eckhardt wrote:
> To be pedantic, you only need to provide source for works derived
> from GPL'd software which in this case means the kernel propper. User
> land applications and device drivers may be shipped in binary-only
> form because they are separate works, even when distributed in
> aggregation with GPL'd software.

One could argue that device drivers are part of the kernel and thus
covered by the GPL, Torvald's assertions to the contrary not with
standing.  It has never been adjudicated in a court of law what the
bounds of mere aggretation are.

That's the huge risk of using Linux.  No one knows or can say with
certainty how such a case would pan out.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message