freebsd-hackers  

Messages by Date

• 1999/08/26 Re: How bullet-proof should the /etc/rc* scripts be? Doug
• 1999/08/26 Intel Merced FreeBSD??? Kenny Drobnack
• 1999/08/26 Re: undocumented vfork behaviour? Jason Thorpe
• 1999/08/26 How bullet-proof should the /etc/rc* scripts be? Stephen J. Roznowski
• 1999/08/26 Re: undocumented vfork behaviour? Terry Lambert
• 1999/08/26 Re: dropped connections (fwd) Terry Lambert
• 1999/08/26 Re: Looking for good QA tests... Terry Lambert
• 1999/08/26 Re: Request for review: vnconfig.c Ben Smithurst
• 1999/08/26 Re: undocumented vfork behaviour? Bjoern Fischer
• 1999/08/26 Re: Looking for good QA tests... Kris Kennaway
• 1999/08/26 Re: Request for review: vnconfig.c Matthew Dillon
• 1999/08/26 Re: (forw) Re: ndc(8) Doug
• 1999/08/26 Re: (forw) Re: ndc(8) sthaug
• 1999/08/26 (forw) Re: ndc(8) Anders Andersson
• 1999/08/26 (forw) Re: ndc(8) Anders Andersson
• 1999/08/26 Default Window Dennis
• 1999/08/26 Re: Seeking testers for change to lib/libc/gen/fts.c Warner Losh
• 1999/08/26 Re: (forw) FreeBSD (and other BSDs?) local root explot Warner Losh
• 1999/08/26 Re: (forw) FreeBSD (and other BSDs?) local root explot Warner Losh
• 1999/08/26 Re: Mandatory locking? Terry Lambert
• 1999/08/26 Re: Looking for good QA tests... Wilko Bulte
• 1999/08/26 Re: mkfifo default creation mode 0777 Ollivier Robert
• 1999/08/26 Examining kernel core dump: gd_curpcb Amit Singh
• 1999/08/26 Request for review: vnconfig.c Mark J. Taylor
• 1999/08/26 Re: Looking for good QA tests... Matthew Dillon
• 1999/08/26 Seeking testers for change to lib/libc/gen/fts.c Peter Holm
• 1999/08/26 Re: (forw) FreeBSD (and other BSDs?) local root explot Julian Elischer
• 1999/08/26 Re: Looking for good QA tests... Mark Murray
• 1999/08/26 Re: Looking for good QA tests... Brian McGovern
• 1999/08/26 Re: Looking for good QA tests... Mark Murray
• 1999/08/26 trying to get into my old add Trevor Morrison
• 1999/08/26 Re: Looking for good QA tests... Matthew Jacob
• 1999/08/26 Re: Looking for good QA tests... Matthew Jacob
• 1999/08/26 Re: Looking for good QA tests... David Malone
• 1999/08/26 Re: Looking for good QA tests... Brian McGovern
• 1999/08/26 (forw) FreeBSD (and other BSDs?) local root explot crypt0genic
• 1999/08/26 Re: HEADS UP Reviewers. VFS changes to be committed. Matthew Dillon
• 1999/08/26 Re: Looking for good QA tests... Brian McGovern
• 1999/08/26 Re: HEADS UP Reviewers. VFS changes to be committed. Mike Smith
• 1999/08/26 Re: Looking for good QA tests... Matthew Jacob
• 1999/08/26 Re: Looking for good QA tests... Brian McGovern
• 1999/08/26 Re: HEADS UP Reviewers. VFS changes to be committed. Alfred Perlstein
• 1999/08/26 Re: Looking for good QA tests... Mark Murray
• 1999/08/26 Re: HEADS UP Reviewers. VFS changes to be committed. Alfred Perlstein
• 1999/08/26 Re: HEADS UP Reviewers. VFS changes to be committed. Matthew Dillon
• 1999/08/26 Re: HEADS UP Reviewers. VFS changes to be committed. Sheldon Hearn
• 1999/08/26 Re: HEADS UP Reviewers. VFS changes to be committed. Dmitrij Tejblum
• 1999/08/26 Re: HEADS UP Reviewers. VFS changes to be committed. Bill Fumerola
• 1999/08/26 Re: df and procfs Sheldon Hearn
• 1999/08/26 Re: df and procfs Neil Blakey-Milner
• 1999/08/26 Re: df and procfs Ben Rosengart
• 1999/08/26 Re: df and procfs Neil Blakey-Milner
• 1999/08/26 Re: anybody love qsort.c? Christopher Seiwald
• 1999/08/26 Re: df and procfs Ben Rosengart
• 1999/08/26 Re: df and procfs Cillian Sharkey
• 1999/08/26 df and procfs Ben Rosengart
• 1999/08/26 Re: HEADS UP Reviewers. VFS changes to be committed. Sheldon Hearn
• 1999/08/26 HEADS UP Reviewers. VFS changes to be committed. Alfred Perlstein
• 1999/08/26 Looking for good QA tests... Brian McGovern
• 1999/08/26 undocumented vfork behaviour? Andrew Gallatin
• 1999/08/26 Re: dropped connections (fwd) Nick Hibma
• 1999/08/26 Re: dropped connections (fwd) Barrett Richardson
• 1999/08/26 dropped connections (fwd) Max Khon
• 1999/08/26 mkfifo default creation mode 0777 Sheldon Hearn
• 1999/08/26 TCP initial sequence numbers Geoff Rehmet
• 1999/08/26 Re: Mandatory locking? Ville-Pertti Keinonen
• 1999/08/25 Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITIONS from 8 to 16 Adrian Filipi-Martin
• 1999/08/25 Re: keyboard + custom keypad. Steve Passe
• 1999/08/25 Re: [Fwd: Re: cvs commit: doc/en/handbook/ports chapter.sgml] John Baldwin
• 1999/08/25 Re: Mandatory locking? Christian Kuhtz
• 1999/08/25 Re: Mandatory locking? Greg Lehey
• 1999/08/25 Re: SPARC? Julian Elischer
• 1999/08/25 Re: SPARC? Jordan K. Hubbard
• 1999/08/25 Re: yea TCP_NODELAY Re: network performance vs. linux on small transfers Wes Peters
• 1999/08/25 Re: Sv: K6/3 on 3.2-STABLE - PROBLEM SOLVED Wes Peters
• 1999/08/25 Re: SPARC? Wes Peters
• 1999/08/25 Re: keyboard + custom keypad. Mike Smith
• 1999/08/25 Alternate System Clock Dies on Asus P2B-S Jeremy Shaffner
• 1999/08/25 keyboard + custom keypad. Steve Passe
• 1999/08/25 Re: Mandatory locking? Terry Lambert
• 1999/08/25 Re: Mandatory locking? Terry Lambert
• 1999/08/25 Re: Mandatory locking? Terry Lambert
• 1999/08/25 Re: Mandatory locking? Terry Lambert
• 1999/08/25 Re: [Fwd: Re: cvs commit: doc/en/handbook/ports chapter.sgml] Nik Clayton
• 1999/08/25 Re: [Fwd: Re: cvs commit: doc/en/handbook/ports chapter.sgml] Nik Clayton
• 1999/08/25 Re: Mandatory locking? Terry Lambert
• 1999/08/25 Re: Sv: K6/3 on 3.2-STABLE - PROBLEM SOLVED Matthew Dillon
• 1999/08/25 Sv: K6/3 on 3.2-STABLE - PROBLEM SOLVED Leif Neland
• 1999/08/25 second round, vfs and fh* calls. Alfred Perlstein
• 1999/08/25 Re: [freebsdcon] radisson reservation Dan Seguin
• 1999/08/25 Re: [freebsdcon] radisson reservation Jordan K. Hubbard
• 1999/08/25 Re: SPARC? Jordan K. Hubbard
• 1999/08/25 Re: Mandatory locking? Daniel C. Sobral
• 1999/08/25 Re: anybody love qsort.c? Akira Wada
• 1999/08/25 Re: Mandatory locking? Jamie Bowden
• 1999/08/25 Re: Mandatory locking? Tim Vanderhoek
• 1999/08/25 Re: [freebsdcon] radisson reservation Dan Seguin
• 1999/08/25 Re: Mandatory locking? Ville-Pertti Keinonen
• 1999/08/25 RE: Mandatory locking? Thomas David Rivers
• 1999/08/25 Re: K6/3 on 3.2-STABLE - PROBLEM SOLVED Gregory Sutter
• 1999/08/25 Re: Need some advice regarding portable user IDs Manuel Bouyer
• 1999/08/25 Re: proposed change for /etc/periodic/* scripts Cillian Sharkey
• 1999/08/25 Re: [freebsdcon] radisson reservation Luigi Rizzo
• 1999/08/25 Re: [freebsdcon] radisson reservation Warner Losh
• 1999/08/25 Re: seek to negative offset? Vadim Kolontsov
• 1999/08/24 Re: Gigabit ethernet support? Wes Peters
• 1999/08/24 Re: mbufs eaten up - when pinging Luigi Rizzo
• 1999/08/24 Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITIONS from 8 to 16 Luigi Rizzo
• 1999/08/24 Re: Mandatory locking? Greg Lehey
• 1999/08/24 Re: Locking in Vinum (was: Mandatory locking?) Greg Lehey
• 1999/08/24 Re: Mandatory locking? Wes Peters
• 1999/08/24 Re: Mandatory locking? Wes Peters
• 1999/08/24 Re: Locking in Vinum (was: Mandatory locking?) Wes Peters
• 1999/08/24 Re: mbufs eaten up - when pinging Christoph Kukulies
• 1999/08/24 Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITIONS from 8 to 16 Mike Smith
• 1999/08/24 Re: Locking in Vinum (was: Mandatory locking?) Sean Eric Fagan
• 1999/08/24 RE: Mandatory locking? Biju Susmer
• 1999/08/24 Re: Mandatory locking? Greg Lehey
• 1999/08/24 RE: Mandatory locking? Biju Susmer
• 1999/08/24 Re: Are certain parts of kernel not using suser() when they should? Nathan Ahlstrom
• 1999/08/24 Re: Mandatory locking? Greg Lehey
• 1999/08/24 Re: Locking in Vinum (was: Mandatory locking?) Terry Lambert
• 1999/08/24 Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITIONS from 8 to 16 Matthew Dillon
• 1999/08/24 Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITIONS from 8 to 16 Terry Lambert
• 1999/08/24 Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITIONS from 8 to 16 Terry Lambert
• 1999/08/24 Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITIONS from 8 to 16 Julian Elischer
• 1999/08/24 Re: Locking in Vinum (was: Mandatory locking?) Greg Lehey
• 1999/08/24 Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITIONS from 8 to 16 Matthew Dillon
• 1999/08/24 Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITIONS from 8 to 16 Terry Lambert
• 1999/08/24 Re: Locking in Vinum (was: Mandatory locking?) Terry Lambert
• 1999/08/24 Re: Mandatory locking? Tim Vanderhoek
• 1999/08/24 Re: Are certain parts of kernel not using suser() when they should? Bill Fumerola
• 1999/08/24 Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITIONS from 8 to 16 Andrzej Bialecki
• 1999/08/24 Re: more... Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITIONS from 8 to 16 Matthew Dillon
• 1999/08/24 Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITIONS from 8 to 16 Ollivier Robert
• 1999/08/24 Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITIONS from 8 to 16 Julian Elischer
• 1999/08/24 Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITIONS from 8 to 16 Julian Elischer
• 1999/08/24 more... Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITIONS from 8 to 16 Matthew Dillon
• 1999/08/24 Re: Mandatory locking? Chuck Robey
• 1999/08/24 Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITIONS from 8 to 16 Matthew Dillon
• 1999/08/24 Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITIONS from 8 to 16 Matthew Dillon
• 1999/08/24 Locking in Vinum (was: Mandatory locking?) Greg Lehey
• 1999/08/24 Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITIONS from 8 to 16 Matthew Dillon
• 1999/08/24 Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITIONS from 8 to 16 Matthew Dillon
• 1999/08/24 Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITIONS from 8 to 16 David Greenman
• 1999/08/24 Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITIONS from 8 to 16 Mark Newton
• 1999/08/24 Are certain parts of kernel not using suser() when they should? Ryan
• 1999/08/24 Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITIONS from 8 to 16 Andrzej Bialecki
• 1999/08/24 Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITIONS from 8 to 16 Mark Newton
• 1999/08/24 Re: K6/3 on 3.2-STABLE - PROBLEM SOLVED John Plevyak
• 1999/08/24 Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITIONS from 8 to 16 Matthew Jacob
• 1999/08/24 Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITIONS from 8 to 16 Matthew Dillon
• 1999/08/24 context of timeout's Nick Hibma
• 1999/08/24 yea TCP_NODELAY Re: network performance vs. linux on small transfers Wayne Cuddy
• 1999/08/24 Re: vm_fault: pager read error on NFS filesystems. Matthew Dillon
• 1999/08/24 Re: Mandatory locking? Tim Vanderhoek
• 1999/08/24 Re: mbufs eaten up - when pinging Gary Jennejohn
• 1999/08/24 Re: K6/3 on 3.2-STABLE Matthew Dillon
• 1999/08/24 K6/3 on 3.2-STABLE John Plevyak
• 1999/08/24 seek to negative offset? John W. DeBoskey
• 1999/08/24 Re: proposed change for /etc/periodic/* scripts Jon Povey
• 1999/08/24 Stopped syscall Orignal
• 1999/08/24 Re: vm_fault: pager read error on NFS filesystems. David Malone
• 1999/08/24 Re: Need some advice regarding portable user IDs Neil A. Carson
• 1999/08/24 Re: Mandatory locking? Christopher Masto
• 1999/08/24 Re: Mandatory locking? Garance A Drosihn
• 1999/08/24 Re: mbufs eaten up - when pinging Luigi Rizzo
• 1999/08/24 Re: NIS and AMD David Wolfskill
• 1999/08/24 Re: Mandatory locking? Garance A Drosihn
• 1999/08/24 Re: Struct user Orignal
• 1999/08/24 NIS and AMD Nathaniel Schein
• 1999/08/24 Re: Struct user Sheldon Hearn
• 1999/08/24 Re: Mandatory locking? Andrew Kenneth Milton
• 1999/08/24 Struct user Dan Seguin
• 1999/08/24 Re: Mandatory locking? Daniel C. Sobral
• 1999/08/24 Re: Mandatory locking? Daniel C. Sobral
• 1999/08/24 Re: Mandatory locking? Daniel C. Sobral
• 1999/08/24 Re: vm_fault: pager read error on NFS filesystems. Matthew Dillon
• 1999/08/24 Re: Mandatory locking? Christopher Masto
• 1999/08/24 mbufs eaten up - when pinging Christoph Kukulies
• 1999/08/24 Re: Mandatory locking? Wes Peters
• 1999/08/24 Re: Mandatory locking? Wes Peters
• 1999/08/24 Re: Mandatory locking? Wes Peters
• 1999/08/24 Re: several messages Wes Peters
• 1999/08/24 Re: ls(1) options affecting -l long format Ben Rosengart
• 1999/08/24 vm_fault: pager read error on NFS filesystems. David Malone
• 1999/08/24 Hub was down this morning Mike Smith
• 1999/08/24 Re: Need some advice regarding portable user IDs der Mouse
• 1999/08/24 Re: Need some advice regarding portable user IDs Bill Sommerfeld
• 1999/08/24 Re: Need some advice regarding portable user IDs Bill Sommerfeld
• 1999/08/24 Re: Need some advice regarding portable user IDs Manuel Bouyer
• 1999/08/24 Re: Need some advice regarding portable user IDs Wolfgang Solfrank
• 1999/08/24 Re: Need some advice regarding portable user IDs Manuel Bouyer
• 1999/08/24 Re: Need some advice regarding portable user IDs Manuel Bouyer
• 1999/08/24 Re: Need some advice regarding portable user IDs Wolfgang Solfrank
• 1999/08/24 Re: Need some advice regarding portable user IDs der Mouse
• 1999/08/24 Re: Need some advice regarding portable user IDs Manuel Bouyer
• 1999/08/24 Re: ls(1) options affecting -l long format Sheldon Hearn
• 1999/08/24 Re: Mandatory locking? Greg Lehey
• 1999/08/24 Re: Mandatory locking? Ville-Pertti Keinonen

• Earlier messages
• Later messages