Oops. I meant, "we should _not_ represent it as an child protection feature".
Am 08.09.2011 17:21, schrieb Tobias Oelgarte: > That is true. But we should represent it as an child protection > feature. It alone can't do the job. But it could help parents with > children playing in the background and users that wan't to read about > controversial content in public. One of the typical, frequently made > requests, if i remember the reasonings of the WMF correctly. > > Tobias > > Am 08.09.2011 17:10, schrieb dex2...@pc.dk: >> That's a property of any filter. But other filters may not fulfil the >> requirement for protecting against accidential display of images. >> >> Sir48/Thyge _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
