On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Tim Starling <tstarl...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > > http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:Controversial_content > > However, the editor community could sabotage it in various ways. For > example, there's no guarantee that anyone will tag any images, or that > tagged images won't be untagged by bots run by administrators. If the > Board really does want a useful image-hiding feature, then it's > essential that the community be persuaded that it is a good idea. > > Personally, I think the filter will be mostly harmless, and that it's > not worth the effort to rail against it. It will be useful for PR -- > it will seem as if we are trying to accomodate all points of view even > if the feature is not particularly useful for parents. > > -- Tim Starling
Because of the dictat nature of the board resolution, I think the key question omitted from the questionnaire was: When (not if) we implement this feature, would you be willing to participate actively in a fork of Wikipedia? Not kidding. -- -- Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]] _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
