Sydney Poore wrote: > Today to be successful organizations; both for-profit and > not-for-profit, must recognize the needs of their global audience. > Offering image filters where people can set their own preferences > and bypass the setting for individual settings is brilliant way > for people with different values to share the same space. No content > is removed, and people can see all images if they choose to.
Agreed. That's why I support the image filter implementation proposed here: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Image_filter_referendum/en/Categories#general_image_filter_vs._category_system or http://goo.gl/t6ly5 Because we seek to accommodate a global audience (comprising people whose beliefs are extremely diverse), I unreservedly oppose any implementation necessitating the designation of certain image types (and not others) as "potentially objectionable" or similar. David Levy _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
