If you find the magic solution fine :)
But let me doubt of such a magic solution, when i see that Adobe did
tried this path. When FalconJS is only prototype and far to be
efficient. When Haxe made some changes to AS3 especially to be able to
compile efficiently to many targets.
Le 16/11/2012 15:07, Kessler CTR Mark J a écrit :
I would say it's possible given how it's compiled. So having a robust compiler
or different compilers for different target environments could be possible.
-----Original Message-----
From: sébastien Paturel [mailto:sebpatu.f...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 8:54
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [POLL] - Must Flex 5 be a complete rewrite or can flex code base
be re-architecture?
"Having more deployed targets based on what we have currently"
But is it possible? thats the question...
Le 16/11/2012 14:50, Kessler CTR Mark J a écrit :
Option 2 ... +1
I would think the community is already based around the current framework.
Having more deployed targets based on what we have currently sounds like a way
to broaden our target audience.
How about we continue to correct and fix the current Flex framework.
Could we start a new namespace that we could use to build up a partial new
framework for a future transition to? It just feels like rewriting everything
from scratch would take a long time and would basically be a separate project.
I'm also envisioning the amount of work the developers using Flex will
have to go through to convert to a completely new framework.
-Mark
