I would say it's possible given how it's compiled. So having a robust compiler or different compilers for different target environments could be possible.
-----Original Message----- From: sébastien Paturel [mailto:sebpatu.f...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 8:54 To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [POLL] - Must Flex 5 be a complete rewrite or can flex code base be re-architecture? "Having more deployed targets based on what we have currently" But is it possible? thats the question... Le 16/11/2012 14:50, Kessler CTR Mark J a écrit : > Option 2 ... +1 > > I would think the community is already based around the current > framework. Having more deployed targets based on what we have currently > sounds like a way to broaden our target audience. > > How about we continue to correct and fix the current Flex framework. > Could we start a new namespace that we could use to build up a partial new > framework for a future transition to? It just feels like rewriting > everything from scratch would take a long time and would basically be a > separate project. > > I'm also envisioning the amount of work the developers using Flex will > have to go through to convert to a completely new framework. > > -Mark >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
