"Having more deployed targets based on what we have currently"
But is it possible? thats the question...
Le 16/11/2012 14:50, Kessler CTR Mark J a écrit :
Option 2 ... +1
I would think the community is already based around the current framework.
Having more deployed targets based on what we have currently sounds like a way
to broaden our target audience.
How about we continue to correct and fix the current Flex framework. Could
we start a new namespace that we could use to build up a partial new framework
for a future transition to? It just feels like rewriting everything from
scratch would take a long time and would basically be a separate project.
I'm also envisioning the amount of work the developers using Flex will have
to go through to convert to a completely new framework.
-Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: sébastien Paturel [mailto:sebpatu.f...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 7:50
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [POLL] - Must Flex 5 be a complete rewrite or can flex code base be
re-architectured?
After several discussions about the difficulty to break UIComponent for
example, and the whole re-architecturing of flex SDK issue.
I'd like to launch this poll to see if there's a consensus about it.
So in your opinion flex SDk:
1- Need a complete re write
2- Can be re architectured from the current code base
Thanks
