On 10/23/12 11 :01AM, "Michael Schmalle" <apa...@teotigraphix.com> wrote:
>Quoting Carol Frampton <cfram...@adobe.com>: > >> >> >> On 10/23/12 10 :51AM, "Om" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Chema, Michael, >>> >>> IMHO, creating sub-tasks is the perfect way to organize such work. I >>> would say don't worry about the 'JIRA noise' it causes. This is part >>>and >>> parcel of what we do here. Wiki pages should be used for documentation >>> purposes and not for organizing work; JIRA is the perfect tool for >>>that. >> >> I suggested the Wiki because they don't have permission to assign JIRA >> issues to themselves. That makes using JIRA for this purpose much more >> complicated. >> >> Carol > >I don't have permission as a committer? I created the task and >assigned it to myself, am I missing something? I know I can't assign a >task to Chema since he is not a listed user. If it wasn't you then it was Chema that said he couldn't can't assign a task. If he is one of the people working on this how is he suppose to indicate this if he can't assign the task to himself? At this point I'm staying out of this. You guys can figure out how you want to do it. I was just trying to help but I only seem to have complicated matters. > >Mike > > > >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Om >>> On Oct 23, 2012 6:44 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <apa...@teotigraphix.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Quoting Carol Frampton <cfram...@adobe.com>: >>>> >>>> Another option rather than JIRA tasks, especially if you aren't able >>>>to >>>>> update them is to create a wiki page and add a table with the >>>>>complete >>>>> list of directories I saw someone sent out yesterday. Then if you're >>>>> working on a directory you can just add your name to the table. We >>>>>did >>>>> this when we working dividing up the mustella tests. >>>>> >>>>> The ant file in the top level develop directory has a checkintests >>>>> target. >>>>> While it does not do bitmap compares like mustella it does some bare >>>>> minimum testing to make sure a checkin isn't going to totally screw >>>>> things >>>>> up. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> So is this exceptable to run for what I will eventually commit? >>>> >>>> The table in the wiki sounds like a good idea for sub tasks. >>>> >>>> >>>> Carol >>>>> >>>>> On 10/23/12 4 :21AM, "Chema Balsas" <jbal...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I've created subtasks in the jira ticket for the four projects that >>>>>> Gordon >>>>>> asked to prioritize for now. >>>>>> This way we can avoid stepping on each other toes ;) >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't seem able to assign subtasks to myself, however. Also, that >>>>>> produced a lot of noise (sorry about that)... is there a better >>>>>> workflow >>>>>> to >>>>>> do this? We should fill the rest of subtasks to get a clear picture >>>>>> of >>>>>> what's done and what remains. >>>>>> >>>>>> 2012/10/23 Chema Balsas <jbal...@gmail.com> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Mike, how are you going with those mustella tests? If you're >>>>>> looking >>>>>>> at >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/FLEX/**Mustella+Overvi >>>>>>>ew >>>>>>> >>>>>>><https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Mustella+Overview> >>>>>>>I' >>>>>>> d >>>>>>> say that for now you just need to read the "Installation" and >>>>>>>"Using >>>>>>> Mustella" sections. Let me know if I can help you with anything. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've just submited a patch for the compile target of mx at >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/FLEX-33226<https://issues.ap >>>>>>>ac >>>>>>> he.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33226>. >>>>>>> Maybe we can use it as >>>>>>> a template if it's what Gordon needs from us. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> @Gordon Please, can you check if this is what you're looking for? I >>>>>>> assume >>>>>>> once we get one right everything will go much faster. Also, running >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> mustella tests is quite hard on my computer so for now I only >>>>>>> verified >>>>>>> it >>>>>>> passed the "mx/utils/ColorUtil" tests. If this is indeed the way to >>>>>>> go, >>>>>>> I'll check if everything works as expected before sending a >>>>>>> definitive >>>>>>> patch. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2012/10/22 Michael Schmalle <apa...@teotigraphix.com> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I haven't yet run those(or know how) and when I was reading to >>>>>>> docs, it >>>>>>>> was a bit over my head at the time. So I'm going to have to figure >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> tests out before I am going to commit anything like I said >>>>>>>> previously. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is there anyone that knows those test to write a child wiki page >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> would explain exactly what a committer needs to know at the >>>>>>>>minimum >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> check in. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There is a lot of information on that one page. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Mike >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Quoting Gordon Smith <gosm...@adobe.com>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think you'd also want to run the Mustella tests. I don't think >>>>>>>> there >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> is an Ant target for those. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> - Gordon >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>> From: Michael Schmalle >>>>>>>>> [mailto:apache@teotigraphix.****com<apa...@teotigraphix.com> >>>>>>>>> ] >>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 1:32 PM >>>>>>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org >>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: compc config adjustements (was RE: ASC 2.0 and >>>>>>>>>Falcon) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ok, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So I'm guessing that running the build is the correct way to test >>>>>>>>> if >>>>>>>>> anything is broken correct? I'm kind of new to this larger scale >>>>>>>>> development and don't want to mess anything up. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> (before I commit to the develop branch) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Mike >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Quoting Gordon Smith <gosm...@adobe.com>: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please prioritize the conversion of >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> frameworks/projects/framework >>>>>>>>>> frameworks/projects/rpc >>>>>>>>>> frameworks/projects/mx >>>>>>>>>> frameworks/projects/spark >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Those four will be a good start. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> - Gordon >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>>> From: Michael Schmalle >>>>>>>>>> [mailto:apache@teotigraphix.****com<apa...@teotigraphix.com> >>>>>>>>>> ] >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 12:19 PM >>>>>>>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: compc config adjustements (was RE: ASC 2.0 and >>>>>>>>>> Falcon) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I did manage to do a prototype conversion this morning of the >>>>>>>>>> frameworks compile target. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> There are a couple things I am uncertain about, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -| resource-bundle-list="${****basedir}/bundles.properties" >>>>>>>>>> -| <jvmarg line="${compc.jvm.args}"/> >>>>>>>>>> -| output="${FLEX_HOME}/****frameworks/libs/framework.swc" >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Tokens in flex-config are just {token} right or the dollar sign >>>>>>>>>> ${token}? It's been awhile for me as well. And I was more with >>>>>>>>>> component dev than setting up component builds with flex-config. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Other than the listed things above, it seems pretty straight >>>>>>>>>> forward >>>>>>>>>> with the tags. If you want to create a list, you can or I will >>>>>>>>>> next >>>>>>>>>> week and we could work it together and then I can commit when it >>>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>> looks good and still compiles the SWCs. :) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Mike >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Quoting Chema Balsas <jbal...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Mike, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I've dealt with the differences between compc and config files >>>>>>>>>>> several times in my day to day work... now I wish I'd written >>>>>>>>>>> them >>>>>>>>>>> down... :D >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I think I could find some time to try and help with this. Have >>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>> already identified which builds need to be updated? We could >>>>>>>>>>> compile >>>>>>>>>>> a list of them, then start from different ends and try to meet >>>>>>>>>>> somewhere halfway... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> @Gordon I don't know if this is a silly question, but is there >>>>>>>>>>>a >>>>>>>>>>> reliable way of telling if the resulting swc is exactly the >>>>>>>>>>>same >>>>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>>> the old one? >>>>>>>>>>> Should something like size or md5 maintained so we could check >>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>> that? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>> Chema >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2012/10/19 Michael Schmalle <apa...@teotigraphix.com> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Ok Gordon, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I think I understand what you are saying, you want include >>>>>>>>>>>>files >>>>>>>>>>>> that completely configure the target without the compc task so >>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>> can be loaded from other clients. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> This is to be commited when changed in the develop branch. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I will ask more questions if needed tomorrow as it sounds like >>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>> is your Apache work day. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for all your answers today it has been appreciated. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mike >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Quoting Gordon Smith <gosm...@adobe.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Could you quickly elaborate on the "convert the <compc> tags" >>>>>>>>>>>> part >>>>>>>>>>>> for me? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Each project in sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects builds a SWC. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For >>>>>>>>>>>>> example, look at the build.xml file inside >>>>>>>>>>>>> sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/******framework, >>>>>>>>>>>>> which builds framework.swc. Its "compile" target has the >>>>>>>>>>>>> <compc> >>>>>>>>>>>>> task >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <compc fork="true" >>>>>>>>>>>>> output="${FLEX_HOME}/** >>>>>>>>>>>>> frameworks/libs/framework.swc" >>>>>>>>>>>>> resource-bundle-list="${** >>>>>>>>>>>>> basedir}/bundles.properties"> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <jvmarg line="${compc.jvm.args}"/> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <target-player>11.1</target-******player> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <namespace >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>uri="library://ns.adobe.com/******flex/mx<http://ns.adobe.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>** >>>>>>>>>>>>> **flex/mx> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://ns.adobe.com/****flex/ <http://ns.adobe.com/**flex/> >>>>>>>>>>>>> mx> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://ns.adobe.com/**flex/mx >>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx>>**" >>>>>>>>>>>>> manifest="${basedir}/manifest.******xml"/> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <namespace >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>uri="http://www.adobe.com/******2006/mxml<http://www.adobe.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>/* >>>>>>>>>>>>> ***2006/mxml> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.adobe.**com/**2006 <http://www.adobe.com/**2006> >>>>>>>>>>>>> /mxml> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.adobe.**com/2006/**mxml >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><http://www.adobe.com/2006/**mxml<http://www.adobe.com/2006/mx >>>>>>>>>>>>>ml >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>" >>>>>>>>>>>>> manifest="${basedir}/manifest.******xml"/> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <include-namespaces >>>>>>>>>>>>> uri="library://ns.adobe.com/* *flex/mx >>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx>"****/> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <include-classes>******FrameworkClasses</include-** >>>>>>>>>>>>> classes> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <source-path >>>>>>>>>>>>> path-element="${basedir}/src"/*** >>>>>>>>>>>>> ***> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <library-path/> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <external-library-path >>>>>>>>>>>>> dir="${FLEX_HOME}/frameworks/***** >>>>>>>>>>>>> *libs"> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <include name="textLayout.swc"/> >>>>>>>>>>>>> </external-library-path> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <external-library-path >>>>>>>>>>>>> dir="${env.PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME}"**** >>>>>>>>>>>>> **> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <include name="${playerglobal.version}/****** >>>>>>>>>>>>> playerglobal.swc"/> >>>>>>>>>>>>> </external-library-path> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <load-config filename="${FLEX_HOME}/** >>>>>>>>>>>>> frameworks/flex-config.xml"/> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <load-config >>>>>>>>>>>>> filename="framework-config.****** >>>>>>>>>>>>> xml"/> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <include-file name="defaults.css" >>>>>>>>>>>>> path="${basedir}/defaults.css"******/> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <include-file >>>>>>>>>>>>>name="defaults-3.0.0.css" >>>>>>>>>>>>> path="${basedir}/defaults-3.0.******0.css"/> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <include-file name="Assets.swf" >>>>>>>>>>>>> path="${basedir}/assets/******Assets.swf"/> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <include-file >>>>>>>>>>>>> name="assets/CalendarIcon.png" >>>>>>>>>>>>> path="${basedir}/assets/******CalendarIcon.png"/> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <locale/> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <accessible>true</accessible> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <keep-as3-metadata name="Bindable"/> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <keep-as3-metadata name="Managed"/> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <keep-as3-metadata >>>>>>>>>>>>>name="ChangeEvent"/> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <keep-as3-metadata name="** >>>>>>>>>>>>> NonCommittingChangeEvent"/> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <keep-as3-metadata name="Transient"/> >>>>>>>>>>>>> </compc> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I want it to look instead like >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <compc fork="true" >>>>>>>>>>>>> load-config="framework-config.******xml"/> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> where you write the framework-config.xml file using the >>>>>>>>>>>>>syntax >>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>> files like flex-config.xml. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The difficulty is that the syntax for the XML you put inside >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> framework-config.xml file is different in various ways from >>>>>>>>>>>>>the >>>>>>>>>>>>> XML >>>>>>>>>>>>> tags inside the <compc> tag (for one thing, XML config files >>>>>>>>>>>>> don't >>>>>>>>>>>>> use >>>>>>>>>>>>> attributes) so the conversion isn't always obvious. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I want the "compile" target for every project in the projects >>>>>>>>>>>>> directory to use a config file for its compilation options. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Then you or I can write JUnit tests that use Falcon to >>>>>>>>>>>>>compile >>>>>>>>>>>>> each >>>>>>>>>>>>> SWC by invoking Falcon with this config file. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Gordon >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Michael Schmalle >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>[mailto:apache@teotigraphix.******com<apa...@teotigraphix.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ] >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 3:49 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: ASC 2.0 and Falcon >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Quoting Gordon Smith <gosm...@adobe.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon I can help with MXML once I get my feet wet in >>>>>>>>>>>>> understanding >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly "What" needs to be implemented. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomorrow I'll be working on eliminating the falcon/sdk >>>>>>>>>>>>>> directory, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> since this violates Apache rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Next week I'll check in the first few MXML parser tests for >>>>>>>>>>>>>> simple >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tags like <Boolean> and <int>. At that point the pattern to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> follow >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for MXML parser tests will be clear. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can help with further tests after this. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Gordon >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, I understand and replied in my previous email that I >>>>>>>>>>>>> realize >>>>>>>>>>>>> MXML is >>>>>>>>>>>>> #1 priority. I will be working on this sooner than later as I >>>>>>>>>>>>> see >>>>>>>>>>>>> what you do. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In the meantime, you could learn XML config file syntax and >>>>>>>>>>>>> convert >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the <compc> tags. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I experimented with the config when I was porting my asdoc >>>>>>>>>>>>> program >>>>>>>>>>>>> that extended mxmlc. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you quickly elaborate on the "convert the <compc> tags" >>>>>>>>>>>>> part >>>>>>>>>>>>> for me? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Michael Schmalle >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>[mailto:apache@teotigraphix.******com<apa...@teotigraphix.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 3:25 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: ASC 2.0 and Falcon >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So in essence you are saying; >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Gordon needs help implementing MXML. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Flex is incompatible with the new VM that is stage3D >>>>>>>>>>>>>>based >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a new architecture for components needs to be created based >>>>>>>>>>>>>>on >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stage3D. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. The ASC compiler of Falcon is going to need to be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> implemented >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to produce bytecode that is compatible with the new AVM. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon I can help with MXML once I get my feet wet in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> understanding exactly "What" needs to be implemented. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quoting Gordon Smith <gosm...@adobe.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Furthermore, the new runtime uses new bytecode that the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Falcon >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> compiler does not produce, and the new compiler that does >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> produce >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it doesn't compile MXML. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Gordon >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Thibault Imbert [mailto:timb...@adobe.com] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 3:16 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ASC 2.0 and Falcon >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Om, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The rendering architecture of the new runtime is Stage3D >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> essentially, there is not "native" DisplayObject. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So your framework needs to leverage Stage3D, just like iOS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leveraging OpenGL for their components UI. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's why we have been funding Starling to help people >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transition to a full Stage3D model. Recently, the community >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> created a drawing API extension for Starling: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>http://www.bytearray.org/?p=******4832<http://www.bytearray. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> g/?p=****4832> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.bytearray.**org/?p= >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.bytearray.org/?p=> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **4832> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>><http://www.bytearray.org/**?**p=48<http://www.bytearray.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>/* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *?p=48> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>><http://www.bytearray.org/?p=**48<http://www.bytearray.org/? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>p= >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 48> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2>and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a few >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weeks back a skeleton bones extension was also created to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> create >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complex animations on top of Starling: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/******DragonBones/****** >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>SkeletonAnimationFramework<https://github.com/****DragonBone >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>s/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ****SkeletonAnimationFramework> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/****DragonBones/**** >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>SkeletonAnimationFramework<https://github.com/**DragonBones/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>** >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SkeletonAnimationFramework> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <htt**ps://github.com/**DragonBones/**** >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>SkeletonAnimationFramework<http://github.com/DragonBones/**S >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> letonAnimationFramework> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ht >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tps://github.com/DragonBones/**SkeletonAnimationFramework<ht >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tp >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ://github.com/DragonBones/SkeletonAnimationFramework> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All of that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is open source, you can fork it, create extensions, etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Feathers is the right model and approach, lightweight UI >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> framework on top of Starling (which does all the Stage3D >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>work >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> behind the scenes). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keep in mind Feathers "vision" is not to replace Flex, it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lightweight UI framework for Uis in games, developed by a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flex >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> developer who wanted to have some of the power of Flex >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (skinning, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> productivity) without reproducing the same mistakes as Flex >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (lots >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of dependencies and display list based). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thibault Imbert | sr. product manager gaming (Graphics, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Language, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VM, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Compiler) | Monocle | adobe systems gaming.adobe.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://gaming.adobe.com/> | bytearray.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://bytearray.org/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | @thibault_imbert >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/18/12 3:01 PM, "Om" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just a heads up, given the architecture changes of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next-gen >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> runtime, Flex will not be able to run in it. I would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "highly" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recommend you guys having a look at Feathers (work from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tynjala >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - feathersui.com) on top of Starling, which will run >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beautifully in our next runtime. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you please give us some technical details as to why >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flex >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wont be able to run in the new runtime? This would help >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>us >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> figure out what we can/need to do given where we are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course, any other information you can provide to help >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>us >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> move >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flex towards Stage3D/Starling would be beneficial. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Om >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Michael Schmalle >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <apa...@teotigraphix.com>******wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quoting Thibault Imbert <timb...@adobe.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Mike, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is true, but ASC is already moving to ASNext >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> targeting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the next generation runtime which is targeting game >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> developers. So our resources are assigned to that and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time we have to take ASC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.0 changes to Falcon, are limited. Gordon will bring >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> key/showstopper bugs fixed in ASC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.0 to Falcon, we cannot commit to anything more. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just a heads up, given the architecture changes of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next-gen runtime, Flex will not be able to run in it. I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "highly" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recommend you guys having a look at Feathers (work from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tynjala >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - feathersui.com) on top of Starling, which will run >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beautifully in our next runtime. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have just started working with Josh and this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>component >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> architecture, it is very nice. I spoke of feathers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>earlier >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> today and was talking with Josh about MXML support. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So your saying there needs to be a component framework >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> developed that will run in the new architecture to be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cross >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compatible? I don't quite understand what you are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>saying. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some videos: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://vimeo.com/51010861 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?*** >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*****v=DGRy7H17MkA&feature=**<http://www.youtube.com/watc >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>h? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ******v=DGRy7H17MkA&feature=**> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>youtu.*<http://www.youtube.**com/watch?****v=DGRy7H17MkA&; >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>** >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>feature<http://www.youtube.com/watch?****v=DGRy7H17MkA&fe >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ure> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> =youtu.*> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*be&hd=<http://www.youtube.****com/watch?**v=DGRy7H17MkA&; >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>** >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>feature=y<http://www.youtube.**com/watch?**v=DGRy7H17MkA&; >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>** >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>feature<http://www.youtube.com/watch?**v=DGRy7H17MkA&feat >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ur >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> =y> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> o >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> utu.**be&hd=> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1< htt >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>p://www.youtube.com/watch?v=******DGRy7H17MkA&feature=you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tu >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>**be&*<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=****DGRy7H17MkA&fea >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tu >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> re=youtu.be&*> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>**h<http://www.youtube.com/**watch?v=**DGRy7H17MkA&featur >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>e= >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*youtu<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=**DGRy7H17MkA&featu >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>re >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> =youtu> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .be&**h> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=1<http://www.youtube.com/****watch?v=DGRy7H17MkA&feature >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*<http://www.youtube.com/**watch?v=DGRy7H17MkA&feature=** >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> youtu.be<http://www.youtube.**com/watch?v=DGRy7H17MkA&** >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>feature=yo<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGRy7H17MkA&fea >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tu >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> re=yo> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> utu.be> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> & >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hd=1> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thibault Imbert | sr. product manager gaming (Graphics, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Language, VM, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Compiler) | Monocle | adobe systems gaming.adobe.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://gaming.adobe.com/> | bytearray.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://bytearray.org/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | @thibault_imbert >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/18/12 11:36 AM, "labri...@digitalprimates.net" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have no plans keeping ASC 2.0 (and above) in sync >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Falcon, as I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said previously, today the compilers are different >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> targeting two different audiences. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeh, we totally get why parsing the AS language and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generating bytecode will be very different for the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>game >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> market. I can't imagine the amount of time you guys >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spending on the differences in for loops alone.... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.teotigraphix.com http://blog.teotigraphix.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.teotigraphix.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://blog.teotigraphix.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.teotigraphix.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://blog.teotigraphix.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.teotigraphix.com >>>>>>>>>>>> http://blog.teotigraphix.com >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Chema >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC >>>>>>>>>> http://www.teotigraphix.com >>>>>>>>>> http://blog.teotigraphix.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC >>>>>>>>> http://www.teotigraphix.com >>>>>>>>> http://blog.teotigraphix.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC >>>>>>>> http://www.teotigraphix.com >>>>>>>> http://blog.teotigraphix.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Chema >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Chema >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC >>>> http://www.teotigraphix.com >>>> http://blog.teotigraphix.com >>>> >>>> >> >> > >-- >Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC >http://www.teotigraphix.com >http://blog.teotigraphix.com >
