On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 05:03:53PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote: > L'octidi 8 frimaire, an CCXXV, James Almer a écrit : > > How about the news entry on the website stating ffserver was meant to > > go with 3.2? And the discussions that lead to it? That's a good rational > > argument. > > # November 29th, 2016, ffserver not removed > # > # Thanks to the efforts of dedicated developers, ffserver has been > # updated and no longer needs to be removed immediately. > > That's taken care of. And I assure you, ffserver users will prefer a > change of mind like that than a follow-through. > > > If you meant technical arguments, the time for those was months ago. > > The time for technical arguments is always. >
> > If there's a vote, it will be to choose between ffserver being removed > > tomorrow, or right before 3.3 is branched. > > There's no "ffserver stays" option. That possibility was lost months > > ago when neither you or anyone else showed up to back it up. > > Hail James, our Great Dictator who decides what we are allowed to vote > about. can everyone please try to not escalate this and be polite to each other thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Its not that you shouldnt use gotos but rather that you should write readable code and code with gotos often but not always is less readable
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
