On 11/28/16, compn <te...@mi.rr.com> wrote: > On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 02:22:48 +0100 > Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > >> I dont know if people want me and reynaldo to spend less time on >> FFmpeg, but time is a finite resource. If ffserver is maintained >> externally it would mean a noticable hit in maintaince man hours of >> FFmpeg. Now it might be that ffserver being pushed out would kill it. >> But really as dumb as i am, i dont belive theres a majority who wants >> to kill FFserver when there are people who actively work on it and >> care about it. > > it seems like there are at least a few developers who would feel better > if ffserver was removed from master / moved somewhere else to die etc. > > these developers feel very strongly about removing ffserver. > > it might be wise to follow the opinions of these developers in order to > have a higher morale and continue the working environment here in the > project. > > otherwise some developers may feel betrayed, harmed, ignored, etc and > foster hatred because their opinions were not chosen. > > so michael, my advice to you is to just OK the patch and deal with > ffserver later... if enough users come back to complain about its > demise. i feel that this discussion is going no where if both sides are > unable to come to a compromise. > > sometimes you have to cut off the toe to save the patient. :)
Exactly what happened with so called separate libpostprocess library. Is it still being maintained? - NOPE. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
