L'octidi 8 frimaire, an CCXXV, James Almer a écrit : > How about the news entry on the website stating ffserver was meant to > go with 3.2? And the discussions that lead to it? That's a good rational > argument.
# November 29th, 2016, ffserver not removed # # Thanks to the efforts of dedicated developers, ffserver has been # updated and no longer needs to be removed immediately. That's taken care of. And I assure you, ffserver users will prefer a change of mind like that than a follow-through. > If you meant technical arguments, the time for those was months ago. The time for technical arguments is always. > If there's a vote, it will be to choose between ffserver being removed > tomorrow, or right before 3.3 is branched. > There's no "ffserver stays" option. That possibility was lost months > ago when neither you or anyone else showed up to back it up. Hail James, our Great Dictator who decides what we are allowed to vote about. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
