On 11/28/2016 12:25 PM, Nicolas George wrote: > L'octidi 8 frimaire, an CCXXV, Ronald S. Bultje a écrit : >> The majority. > > Rational arguments first.
How about the news entry on the website stating ffserver was meant to go with 3.2? And the discussions that lead to it? That's a good rational argument. You want rationality yet you fight to override an old project decision. If you meant technical arguments, the time for those was months ago. If there's a vote, it will be to choose between ffserver being removed tomorrow, or right before 3.3 is branched. There's no "ffserver stays" option. That possibility was lost months ago when neither you or anyone else showed up to back it up. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
