Le septidi 7 frimaire, an CCXXV, James Almer a écrit : > We don't care about testing it with FATE.
Yes, we do. > It appears to me that you still > don't > get that ffserver is being *dropped*. It is, as discussed and announced, no > longer part of the project. Untrue. It is still there. There are threats of developers about to remove it, but they are in the future. The gist of it is that YOU want ffserver dropped, and you do so for emotional reasons, not rational ones. Your emotional reasons are inspired by rational ones, but only inspired, because you did not update your conclusions when the status of the rational reasons changed. The rational behaviour is: IF ffserver prevents other aspects of the development, for examples merges from the fork, THEN something must be done about it SOON, FOR EXAMPLE dropping it, but possibly something else, provided it happens soon. IF ffserver is unmaintained but does not block aspects of the development, then there is no rational reason to drop it in the short term. Maybe later. On the other hand, there are reasons NOT to drop it: some users use it. IF ffserver is maintained, there is no reason to drop it whatsoever. The way I read the discussions, the decision top drop was made when we were in the first case. But you can notice that "but possibly something else" just happened, and it happened soon enough. Since Michael's patches ensure that ffserver no longer blocks merges, there is no longer a reason to drop ffserver urgently. Therefore, the decision to drop it tomorrow is void. Regards, -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
