On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 04:57:36PM +0100, Clément Bœsch wrote: > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 04:25:18PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > [...] > > ffserver had 14 commits to it in about the last month > > That's also pretty close to the number of commits in the last years. > > Good will in the last weeks is not enough of a technical > merit/justification to prevent the removal of junk code scheduled for > deletion for a long time now.
why do you call it junk ? and the sheduling for deletion was conditional on it not being fixed IIRC. Why the hurry to remove it while people work on fixing it ? its not blocking anything ATM AFAIK and why is this escalating in such a strange way, theres no need to become aggressive. Does the project really have too many developers? If thats the case can you point me to someone to take over coverity testing ? I cant find one ... also reynaldo, has done alot for the project, not just through volunteer work, but also by finding one of the very few sponsors who funded students working in FFmpeg under the OPW as well as helping with GSoC and OPW admin work. For all i know reynaldo is not being paid to work on FFmpeg. shouldnt you be a little nicer ... [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Freedom in capitalist society always remains about the same as it was in ancient Greek republics: Freedom for slave owners. -- Vladimir Lenin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
