On 28.10.2016 19:31, compn wrote: > On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:42:22 -0300 James Almer wrote: >> On 10/27/2016 3:36 PM, Reynaldo H. Verdejo Pinochet wrote: >>> On 10/27/2016 11:25 AM, James Almer wrote: >>>> This is not how things were agreed. >>> I haven't agreed to this. >> You could have shown your displeasure in the relevant discussion and >> patch threads, and on IRC. Why didn't you? >> >> A quick search on the archive shows >> https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2016-April/192808.html >> https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2016-July/196500.html > > but then there was this in september, after the news entry was posted > > http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2016-September/199686.html > > i'd suggest talking to that person before applying said patch. > > we can talk before applying a patch still, right? :)
What's the current status of this "Resurrection of ffserver"? Is there a work-in-progress git repository available somewhere? Best regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
