On 10/27/2016 3:22 PM, Reynaldo H. Verdejo Pinochet wrote: > I understand you might be upset but please refrain from > using bad language. > > The way I see it your removal will happen once there's a > solution in place just not before. This is why the patch > is not rejected.
This is not how things were agreed. I'm all for a working ffserver replacement, but if a decision is made and announced, it can't be changed just like that out of nowhere. This is not how a project should work. > > Bests, > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
