On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 21:13:54 +0100 Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 25.11.2016 10:36, wm4 wrote: > > I'd like to add that removing the ffserver support from the libs, and > > all deprecated stuff it depends on, will make it actually easier to > > readd ffserver in a cleaner way. It reduces the risk that the new > > ffserver accidentally depends on mechanisms that were supposed to go > > away. > > However, that can't be done before the next major bump. I contest this too. The ffm muxer/demuxer does not affect ABI and has no use outside of ffserver. > > Also, the promise was that developers would pick up ffserver again and > > update it. This hasn't really happened - instead it weirdly looks like > > the ffserver faction is stalling for time. Maybe the interest to keep > > it alive isn't that high after all. > > To me it looks more like they simply lack the time to work on it. Plenty of time was granted. Several years more than Libav did. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
