On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:03:07AM -0700, Reynaldo H. Verdejo Pinochet wrote: > I'm not OK with this patch. My reasons are: > > * There are users relying on it > * We gain nothing by removing ffserver without a > replacement or alternate solution > > One solution I would support is a transition made by > moving all applications to a separate repo hosted within > the same infra. With a commitment not break our own apps. > The server will be fixed to work using public API in the > process. I can work on this with whoever wants to help.
I agree with moving the apps to a seperate repo hosted within the same infra and keeping ffserver. I will help with ffserver as my time & todo list permits [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Why not whip the teacher when the pupil misbehaves? -- Diogenes of Sinope
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
