On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 7:20 PM PGC <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Saturday, August 1, 2020 at 1:12:49 AM UTC+2, Jason wrote: >> >> There have been 65 studies on HCQ. Of all the tests that looked at giving >> it early in the disease, or prophylactically, they showed HCQ was >> beneficial. This site summarizes them all: https://c19study.com/ >> >> The only studies that have shown HCQ to be ineffective are those where it >> is given late in the disease progression (when the disease shifts from the >> viral >> replication phase to an immune system dysregulation phase >> <https://www.evms.edu/media/evms_public/departments/internal_medicine/EVMS_Critical_Care_COVID-19_Protocol.pdf> >> (see page 2)). Even then, 61% of studies have shown some effectiveness even >> when it is given late. >> >> Given the well-established safety >> <https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/resources/pdf/fsp/drugs/Hydroxychloroquine.pdf> >> record of HCQ, this is the dilemma we face: >> >> HCQ works HCQ doesn't work >> HCQ widely dispensed 10,000s of thousands of lives saved $20 wasted per >> patient >> HCQ use restricted 10,000s of thousands of needless deaths $0 wasted per >> patient >> >> Even in the face of impartial information on its effectiveness, the >> decision is clear. >> > > > https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/04-07-2020-who-discontinues-hydroxychloroquine-and-lopinavir-ritonavir-treatment-arms-for-covid-19 > > Why not find out from the WHO or the steering committee itself? Just be > prepared to wait as I believe they are somewhat busy. > > But contact them > Find out what from the WHO? Jason -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CA%2BBCJUgr44E7y3_qc6XA1v6K%2Bv4H348oRj%2BRxCXpVE4e2%2BmQWg%40mail.gmail.com.
