On Saturday, June 15, 2019 at 1:20:08 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 4:10 PM Philip Thrift <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> On Friday, June 14, 2019 at 5:48:22 PM UTC-5, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> This is physics and a range of experiments confirm this. The Bell 
>>> inequality, to take this argument further, with polarizers is if one 
>>> polarizer is set 30 degrees relative to the other, then think of the 
>>> photons as polarized in the way a nail has a direction. 30 degrees is a 
>>> third of a right angle, and so if we think of the photons as being like 
>>> nails aligned in a certain direction, then at least 1/3rd of these nails 
>>> would be deflected away. This is why an upper bound of 2/3rds of the 
>>> photons in a classical setting will make it through, or less will by 
>>> attenuating effects etc. But the quantum result gives 3/4. This is a 
>>> violation of the Bell inequality, and with polarizers it is found in a 
>>> "quantization on the large." Of course sensitive experiments work with one 
>>> photon at a time, but the same result happens. This is done to insure there 
>>> are not some other statistical effect at work between photons. 
>>>
>>> LC
>>>
>>
>>
>> Bell's theorem is wrong. If p_hid(X) is the distribution of hidden 
>> variables, and p_det(D) is the distribution of detector settings, and 
>> p(X,D) is the joint distribution, then it assumes
>>
>>        p(X,D) = p_hid(X)·p_det(D)
>>
>> an unwarranted (religious fundamentalist) assumption.
>>
>
> The trouble with your fundamentalist assumption is that it does not work 
> in real physics. You have only to give a plausible dynamical model of how 
> this works for the Aspect experiment, say, and we will accept that you have 
> a point. But you are unable to do this. I would lay long odds on the fact 
> they you will be unable to do it, even given an infinite amount of time and 
> computing power.
>
> Bruce
>


People can go though life believing whatever they want.

@philipthrift 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/d2ec84a4-6bfa-4058-8252-f0a49069b4df%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to