On Tuesday, June 11, 2019 at 7:13:55 AM UTC-5, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, June 11, 2019 at 6:38:41 AM UTC-5, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>>
>> ...
>> This trend has galloped off into some sort of nonsense. Some of these 
>> people are fairly well known, such as Dowkers, Wharton, Sorkin and Deutsch, 
>> but they have all gone into some sort of fantasy land. It is too bad in a 
>> way that Bohr is not still alive to shake his finger at these folks. It 
>> appears that in some ways this is a case of Alan Ginsburg's *Howl*, with 
>> "I have seen the best minds of this generation go mad." These ideas are so 
>> patently wrong, that with a fairly basic even minimal argument based on 
>> plain vanilla QM they can be seen as false.
>>
>> LC
>>  
>>
>>>
>>>
> So *Fay Dowker *and *Rafael Sorkin *
>
>    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fay_Dowker
>    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rafael_Sorkin
>
> are now in fantasy land. 
>
> You want to turn physics into a religious fundamentalist cult.
>
> @philipthrift
>

Sorry, but there are trends in academia where people by virtue of their 
position are able to promote nonsense. I think Jonathan Swift had a bit to 
say with the the floating island of Laputia, which was a knock on academia. 

The problem with Dowker and her path integral ideas is the path integral is 
a math method; it has no additional physical content. In fact in general in 
the way it is written it has less content because it is expanded around a 
classical extremum. QFT is much the same. QFT sets commutators of 
observables with spacelike separations to zero, when quantum mechanics in 
its pure setting tells us there is nonlocality and this condition is an 
auxiliary postulate meant to ease calculations. String theory has some 
"funnies" to it as well. The interesting thing about the holographic 
principle with black holes is it tells us that quantum fields are 
projections from fields near the horizon where Lorentz symmetry has these 
quantum field in a time dilated and nonrelativistic QM form. In effect 
plain vanilla QM, the stuff in Merzbacher or Cohen-Tannoudji etc is really 
the fundamental stuff. 

Along these lines with fundamental physics, with exceptional group theory, 
Leech lattice, and Jordan algebras etc, the theta representation of these 
involve equations that in complex form are Schrodinger equations. In a 
Euclideanized form they are heat equations with heat kernel solutions. When 
applied to the integral representation of qubits on a stretched horizon it 
does suggest that in some fancy way, say with relationships between 
entanglements, causality and spacetime, the most fundamental theory of the 
universe is just plain QM. 

I would strongly advise anyone to avoid ideas about hidden variables or in 
this case ideas of advanced potentials that in ways "wire up" the 
appearance of nonlocality with local rules. For various reasons these ideas 
are not consistent with QM, and at the end of it all these ideas do not 
produce QM as some derived result, but rather demolish it. 

LC

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/26687afd-95b1-4574-bf79-cfdb9b8e1114%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to