On 6/1/2025 6:26 PM, John Clark wrote:
On Sun, Jun 1, 2025 at 8:35 PM Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote:

    //
    /> That's not what Noether's theorem says.  Time symmetry means
    that if you put a time shift in the equations of evolution, then
    equations remain valid. /


*That's what I said!**If there's a symmetry then there's a corresponding conservation law, equations remain valid because something has been conserved, and in the case of time it is energy.
*
What I was objecting to is you wrote, "... if energy is conserved then the universe should look the same from one time to another..." which is the converse of your (correct) statement below.  This is an interesting point.  Expansion of the universe is a failure of time symmetry that allows, but does not imply, failure of energy conservation.

Brent
**

    /> In your interpretation any process that conserved energy would
    leave the system unchanged/


*And I also saidthat if all you know is that there is a conservation law then Noether's theoremcan you tell you nothing. It only works one way. *
*
*
*John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>*
ugg




    On 6/1/2025 4:38 AM, John Clark wrote:
    On Sun, Jun 1, 2025 at 3:16 AM Alan Grayson
    <[email protected]> wrote:

        /> But the question persists; when photons redden as the
        universe expands, where does the lost energy go? AG/


    *The energy doesn't go anywhere, it's just destroyed, energy is
    not conserved at the cosmic level. Noether's theorem says if
    there's a symmetry, then there's a corresponding conservation law
    (but the reverse does not necessarily hold, if there is a
    conservation law there may or may not be a corresponding symmetry). *
    *
    *
    *In the case of energy Noether says the corresponding symmetry is
    time, at the cosmic scale if energy is conserved then the
    universe should look the same from one time to another, but if
    the universe is expanding it doesn't look the same from one time
    to another, and if the universe is accelerating then time is even
    less symmetrical. So energy is not conserved globally, however
    it's still true that at the local level if things are at thermal
    equilibrium then the amount of energy entering a finite volume of
    space will equal the amount of energy leaving that volume.*
    *
    *

    --

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv0rzESU%2Bbm0%2BKOAZpJ8Jvmnrxz%2B02f35PDzKyhRYBGQxQ%40mail.gmail.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv0rzESU%2Bbm0%2BKOAZpJ8Jvmnrxz%2B02f35PDzKyhRYBGQxQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/3adc30d3-0812-4e29-9e1a-0a8beceebe4b%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to