Thanks for the information. But in this case breakdown is occurring and the 
question is if it can be problematic.

Doug Smith
Sent from my iPhone
IPhone: 408-858-4528
Office: 702-570-6108
Email: d...@dsmith.org
Website: http://dsmith.org
________________________________
From: Richard Nute <ri...@ieee.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2025 5:02:05 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: Re: [PSES] major safety issue possibly affecting 20% of the electronic 
devices in use




Hi John and Doug:



Some years ago, HP-Agilent-Keysight-Avago did a study of endurance of 
opto-isolator isolation.  The results were published in Application Note 1074.  
Clearly, opto-isolator solid insulation withstands many hours at 1.2/50 us test 
voltages.  I assume that ordinary solid insulations behave similarly.



Enjoy!  And best regards,

Rich





From: John Woodgate <j...@woodjohn.uk>
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2025 2:42 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] major safety issue possibly affecting 20% of the electronic 
devices in use



Have I understood correctly, that after 100 000 of the 800 V pulse test, the 
EUTs failed the normal hi-pot test? This is not a test on newly-made products, 
to which IEC safety standards are applicable. Of course, the tests in such 
standards can be applied to products that have seen service, but failures are 
to be expected.

On 2025-02-27 21:32, doug emcesd.com wrote:

Hi Rich,



If there is a true air gap not involving other material then I agree with you. 
Then the only problem is with medical as those cross gap discharges are 
essentially ESD events and will cause response from tissues.



If the “air” gap is on a circuit board then we have a problem. If I breakdown a 
gap on a board with a million discharges (a number easy to reach in a month in 
the field with EFT plus the following multiple discharges that follows each 
pulse) I think there is danger of forming a conductive path on the board, 
decades ago we called these “carbon tracks.”



I have observed these since I started designing and building high voltage 
circuits in 1963 (it’s a wonder that I did not electrocute myself back then).



The little supply that generated some of the data for the paper used to have 
this effect only below 3,000 Volt pulses with the "sweet" spot at 800 Volts. 
But now it will exhibit this behavior above 3,000 Volts as well so something 
has changed in the supply.



I have confirmed this effect at three locations using different ESD guns, 
different scopes, and different power supplies.



Doug Smith

Sent from my iPhone

IPhone: 408-858-4528

Office: 702-570-6108

Email: d...@dsmith.org<mailto:d...@dsmith.org>

Website: 
http://dsmith.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__dsmith.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=c9NR2mGfldry-2pM9Bbuww&m=HEwWWpC6EekjQvBgJx9NDFQdRE9hHXS2tWyWA_clHa8PrtgeTU05lvgxcYNWHiCD&s=RGS2mq8L8nV2Z-y4ueyF6DslGo2MjWyF4YJMdcu9M-0&e=>

________________________________
________________________________

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.mail-2Darchive.com_emc-2Dpstc-40listserv.ieee.org_&d=DwMFaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=c9NR2mGfldry-2pM9Bbuww&m=HEwWWpC6EekjQvBgJx9NDFQdRE9hHXS2tWyWA_clHa8PrtgeTU05lvgxcYNWHiCD&s=2GygvslVGTSTLH2fEvgcQZPwvvCwOcWdn9mkYoZjZac&e=>

Website: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/ 
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__ewh.ieee.org_soc_pses_&d=DwMFaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=c9NR2mGfldry-2pM9Bbuww&m=HEwWWpC6EekjQvBgJx9NDFQdRE9hHXS2tWyWA_clHa8PrtgeTU05lvgxcYNWHiCD&s=QXEDFLZmgCPq7SX9j9WHfejlQLcQZv2CjKnGPwCLbrM&e=>
Instructions: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__ewh.ieee.org_soc_pses_list.html&d=DwMFaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=c9NR2mGfldry-2pM9Bbuww&m=HEwWWpC6EekjQvBgJx9NDFQdRE9hHXS2tWyWA_clHa8PrtgeTU05lvgxcYNWHiCD&s=Ug-OZ_7GtvGFSurYXA4oUZZAEgwyIcNjLFq6f7YDYKs&e=>
List rules: 
https://pses.ieee.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/EM-PSTC-List-Rules.pdf<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__pses.ieee.org_wp-2Dcontent_uploads_2024_12_EM-2DPSTC-2DList-2DRules.pdf&d=DwMFaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=c9NR2mGfldry-2pM9Bbuww&m=HEwWWpC6EekjQvBgJx9NDFQdRE9hHXS2tWyWA_clHa8PrtgeTU05lvgxcYNWHiCD&s=LmTr3aMlsdw_itO45FRnQLHsqkrLbiN_EuKtokIlZbQ&e=>

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: msherma...@comcast.net<mailto:msherma...@comcast.net>
Rick Linford at: linf...@ieee.org<mailto:linf...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher at: j.bac...@ieee.org<mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org>

________________________________

To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: 
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/

Website:  https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
Instructions:  https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)
List rules: 
https://pses.ieee.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/EM-PSTC-List-Rules.pdf

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: msherma...@comcast.net
Rick Linford at: linf...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
_________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: 
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1

Reply via email to