Hi All,

A few years ago, I accidentally discovered during my research, that I can 
breakdown the AC mains barrier on many electronic devices with an 800 volt 
common mode pulse which appears to be due to the EMI line filter. After the 
pulse, the barrier was broken down several times in the next microsecond or so 
following my applied pulse. This happens in about 1/3 of the devices I have 
tested from small wall wart supplies to a 1.5 kW supply in a semiconductor fab. 
I published a portion of my results at an Institute of Physics symposium in 
England. My talk was as an associate of Oxford University and the paper went 
through the Oxford approval process. This information is taught in detail as 
part of my technical seminars now as well. The phenomenon was not described in 
the literature before my paper to my knowledge.

What I did not realize then was that breaking over the isolation barrier of a 
device on a regular basis, say a hundred times a day, could over time, damage 
the barrier, cause a Hi-Pot test failure, and the equipment would become a 
safety hazard unknown to the users of the device.

So myself and an attendee at my class last week are setting out to see if this 
phenomenon is a hazard. If it is, then a large number of electronic devices in 
use, millions of them, are in fact safety hazards which would not pass a Hi-Pot 
test administered after a year in the field.

My question is: have any of you looked into anything like this and would you 
like to join me?

I have plans for measuring the breakdown of a barrier without significantly 
damaging it when testing it to breakdown. I have a coupe of ways of doing this.

Then I need an appropriate pulse generator (with no moving parts). The only one 
that works to produce a pulse per second for days is made by Fischer Custom 
Communications in Torrance. CA. I have one so that is not a problem.

If barrier damage is found, a significant rethinking of the Hi-Pot test is 
required and power supplies need to address this in their designs.  I have some 
simple design changes that would accomplish this.

Doug
[https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/_HuR3Ky2TF_XhFHyxnYRmiq7nHQldnMsPNYFaLG6kb5T4y8MeCe-BDC_BscJtSFgszSSjssihHS-pjM3-jwNP8S0CwE-gN8fsRsPkojiAlmpBwb20vIVizS-siCUywW_jqrefbVr]

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org/

Website:  https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
Instructions:  https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)
List rules: 
https://pses.ieee.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/EM-PSTC-List-Rules.pdf

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: msherma...@comcast.net
Rick Linford at: linf...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
_________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: 
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1

Reply via email to