Max Nikulin <maniku...@gmail.com> writes: >> I am not following this branch of the discussion closely, but what about >> not inviting a new DSL here and instead using Elisp sexps here? >> Something like (latex body) (html none) ((not (or latex html)) contents) > > I do not mind in general. Just a couple of questions: > - How to specify whether the rule should be applied to derived backends? > - Is there a ready to use function that can interpret such expressions?
Good question. I guess that what I propose is still a new DSL at the end... Oh well. I guess that the closest existing DSL would be what `buffer-match-p' function uses. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
