Ihor Radchenko writes:
> If I were to choose an alternative symbol other than "_", I'd choose
> "@":
>
> @name{<contents>}
> @name{{<contents}}
> @name[:key value ...]{<contents>}
>
> 1. It is similar to Texinfo
> 2. It does not clash with TeX
> 3. We already use @ in the inline export snippets.
I like the "@" alternative a lot. And I agree with all three points. It is
also compact without losing clarity, and does not give the feeling of a
blank space before, as in the case of "_".
Best regards,
Juan Manuel
