Juan Manuel Macías <maciasch...@posteo.net> writes:
> And how about this:
>
> %_name{<contents>}
> %_name{{<contents>}} <--- extra {} is added as needed for escaping
> %_name[:key value ...]{<contents>}
>
> or any other symbol instead of "%" ?
>
> N.B.: I must admit this is more for an "aesthetic" reason. Although
> perhaps it can be useful to search in the documents.
I have to admit that I am not a big fan of underscore in _name myself.
Just wanted to keep some resemblance of src_name{<contents>} yet not
making things too verbose (like block_name{<contents>}).
If I were to choose an alternative symbol other than "_", I'd choose
"@":
@name{<contents>}
@name{{<contents}}
@name[:key value ...]{<contents>}
1. It is similar to Texinfo
2. It does not clash with TeX
3. We already use @ in the inline export snippets.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
