On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 6:15 PM Martin Thomson <m...@lowentropy.net> wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021, at 11:08, Paul Wouters wrote: > > This discussion should be around reasonable and secure wire and > > presentation formats, not about "but we already deployed this". > > It should surely be taken into account if changing at this point > > gives enough benefits, but the idea of changing should not be > > dismissed out of hand. > > Fair point. I would request that if changes are made, then a new > codepoint is used. I think that is a reasonable request. If that means > that this codepoint is now burned and unusable; and that is a problem due > to a scarce supply, then maybe more care is needed in future about early > allocations (I agree that this one was premature). > You are aware that we're at code point ~66 of 61000-ish possible non-reserved values, right? (See https://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-parameters/dns-parameters.xhtml#dns-parameters-4 for the table and procedures.) Burning a code point is not a concern in terms of resource exhaustion.... Brian
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
