Moin! On 20 May 2021, at 19:59, Eric Orth wrote:
> A big selling point behind why we have client implementers planning to > query HTTPS records is the expectation that this will be the only query > type we will need to add and that it can be extended to handle any future > information we need for establishing HTTPS connections (and we want > mechanisms to be able to add stuff in the future to keep improving HTTPS > connection behavior). It is not practical to add too many additional DNS > queries to make web requests, and nobody wants a > deprecation/new-SVCB-based-record-type cycle every time we need to add > something. So in the end, I do not expect HTTPS would see much adoption > without the extensibility. I fully agree. The point I was making is that ECH sort of already is an extension that were not in the original draft and there may be other Enhancements in the future. So long -Ralf ——- Ralf Weber _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
