On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:50 PM Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@icann.org> wrote:
> Are these still just idle ideas you are tossing out (as you indicated > earlier), or meant to be serious proposals? If the latter, what is the > significant improvement over the current draft? I ask because it feels like > you are suggesting moving the inherent complexity of the semantics of SCVB > around, but not noticeably reducing it overall. Unless there is a > significant reduction in complexity, I don't see the value of grinding on > this further. (I say this as someone who is not happy with the current > level of complexity of the semantics, but don't see a way to reduce it.) > > --Paul Hoffman It is meant to be a serious proposal. The improvement is in the clarity and parse-ability of the HTTPS record in zone file format, including reducing the complexity of the HTTPS-specific semantics, without changing the actual wire format semantics or complexity per se. I'm working on the details of that, but it will necessarily be its own work-in-progress. I hope to get something stable based on feedback... I don't expect to get it 100% right on the first pass. The first pass should hopefully illustrate the benefits at least, and justify keeping list activity ongoing. Brian
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
