Are these still just idle ideas you are tossing out (as you indicated earlier), 
or meant to be serious proposals? If the latter, what is the significant 
improvement over the current draft? I ask because it feels like you are 
suggesting moving the inherent complexity of the semantics of SCVB around, but 
not noticeably reducing it overall. Unless there is a significant reduction in 
complexity, I don't see the value of grinding on this further. (I say this as 
someone who is not happy with the current level of complexity of the semantics, 
but don't see a way to reduce it.)

--Paul Hoffman

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to