In article <cbdd85c7-7ef4-9306-ebf9-ee6b67ac4...@nthpermutation.com> you write: >you've got a point - why not just include all 43?
I think because on any real network, at least 41 of them will not be used, and there's no way to guess which. While I think that these non-ccTLDs are as good a candidate as we're ever going to find for TLDs on which you can squat without colliding with a real domain name, after many decades of squattage we're no closer to having any idea how you can squat safely and without leaking. Indeed, with the advent of DoH that deliberately circumvents the system resolver we're probably farther than we were a decade ago. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
