In article <8bf10121-cf4b-4341-bc40-f427a8f4b...@apnic.net> you write: >This is likely to be a Fine Proposal, worthy of serious consideration, but the >venue where such >topics should be considered is elsewhere, in my view. I realise that >explicitly opposing such WG >calls for adoption is tantamount to heresy in today’s IETF, but nevertheless I >must record my >opposition to adoption.
Agreed. The proposal is technically fine but for better or worse, ICANN is in charge of the TLD namespace these days. If something else like .onion that has a technical aspect comes along, we can probably deal with that, with ICANN's tacit cooperation, but I wouldn't push it. R's, JOhn _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
