I wonder what would have happened if this RFC was available a time before IDNs were defined, someone decided to use .xn and assume xn was only an internal use thing.
Rubens > On 12 Jun 2020, at 12:12, Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > All, > > As we stated in the meeting and in our chairs actions, we're going to run > regular calls for adoptions over the next few months. We are looking for > *explicit* support for adoption. > > > This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-arends-private-use-tld > > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-arends-private-use-tld/ > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-arends-private-use-tld/> > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by > DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. > > Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. > > This call for adoption ends: 26 June 2020 > > Thanks, > tim wicinski > DNSOP co-chair > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
