On Sun, 14 Jun 2020, Michael StJohns wrote:
That said, I'd prefer it if the document selected a few (<=10) codes from these ranges so that filtering may be built into various servers and clients to prevent leakage.
Then you would expect DNS libraries and recursive servers to treat the selected ones differently from the non-selected ones? That would only complicate things further. Now there is an unofficial difference in these unassigned names, "IETF handled" and "non-IETF handled". Paul _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
