On Monday, 13 May 2019 08:14:34 UTC Miek Gieben wrote: > I agree with Paul here. Also sidesteps questions like why HINFO is not in > this list.
i disagree with paul here. see below. > > On Mon, 13 May 2019, 09:08 Paul Hoffman, <paul.hoff...@icann.org> wrote: > > On May 13, 2019, at 3:00 PM, Evan Hunt <e...@isc.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 07:47:35AM +0000, Paul Hoffman wrote: > > >> A far easier approach is for any developer to feel free to treat these > > >> RRtypes as unknown RRtypes. > > > > > > I'm not sure I understand the distinction you're making here? > > > What you said sounds similar to what the document proposes, so > > > perhaps the document is unclear, or perhaps I've misunderstood you. > > > > I am proposing that we don't need a document, nor changes to the IANA > > registry: just treat whatever RRtypes you as a developer feel are no > > longer > > used as unknown types and move on. as with IQUERY, we must document deprecations so that implementors and maintainers will know which burdens they can avoid. having it be a matter of ad-hoc "in-crowd" knowledged passed down from mother to daughter is not the internet engineering way. -- Paul _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
