On May 13, 2019, at 11:06 AM, Ondřej Surý <ond...@isc.org> wrote: > I still would like to continue with this and I still think it’s a no brainer
It is far from a no-brainer. The implementation of this document will leave RFC-compliant systems in an unknown state. A far easier approach is for any developer to feel free to treat these RRtypes as unknown RRtypes. > But I do have a question for the WG - should we add a text that would allow > the “Expert Review” to formally > DEPRECATE (as defined in this I-D) other RRTYPEs? This would make things > much simpler in the > future when we want to formally cleanup more obsoleted records (like NINFO > and RKEY, etc...). No; see above. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
