> On 13 May 2019, at 09:22, Joe Abley <jab...@hopcount.ca> wrote:
> 
> I would prefer documented agreement about what is obsolete and what is not.

+1

Though a definition of what is meant by obsolete might be needed too: "no 
longer seen in the wild but could still be alive in closed environments", 
"deader than Elvis", "implementers MUST completely ignore this", "implementers 
SHOULD now treat this as an unknown RRype", etc.

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to