> On 13 May 2019, at 09:22, Joe Abley <jab...@hopcount.ca> wrote: > > I would prefer documented agreement about what is obsolete and what is not. +1 Though a definition of what is meant by obsolete might be needed too: "no longer seen in the wild but could still be alive in closed environments", "deader than Elvis", "implementers MUST completely ignore this", "implementers SHOULD now treat this as an unknown RRype", etc. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
- [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sury-depre... Ondřej Surý
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-s... Jim Reid
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-s... Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Fwd: New Version Notification for d... Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Fwd: New Version Notification f... Evan Hunt
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Fwd: New Version Notificati... Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Fwd: New Version Notifi... Miek Gieben
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Fwd: New Version Notifi... Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Fwd: New Version N... Jim Reid
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Fwd: New Version Notifi... Shane Kerr
- [DNSOP] reply (and free review) Re: [Ext]... Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Fwd: New Version Notification f... Martin Hoffmann