Hi,

I still would like to continue with this and I still think it’s a no brainer 
and I know this is super uninteresting
to anyone but the DNS software vendors.

But I do have a question for the WG - should we add a text that would allow the 
“Expert Review” to formally
DEPRECATE (as defined in this I-D) other RRTYPEs?  This would make things much 
simpler in the
future when we want to formally cleanup more obsoleted records (like NINFO and 
RKEY, etc...).

Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý
ond...@isc.org

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
> Subject: New Version Notification for 
> draft-sury-deprecate-obsolete-resource-records-01.txt
> Date: 13 May 2019 at 10:58:27 GMT+7
> To: "Evan Hunt" <e...@isc.org>, "Ondrej Sury" <ond...@isc.org>
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-sury-deprecate-obsolete-resource-records-01.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Ondrej Sury and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name:         draft-sury-deprecate-obsolete-resource-records
> Revision:     01
> Title:                Deprecating obsolete DNS Resource Records Types
> Document date:        2019-05-13
> Group:                Individual Submission
> Pages:                5
> URL:            
> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sury-deprecate-obsolete-resource-records-01.txt
> Status:         
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sury-deprecate-obsolete-resource-records/
> Htmlized:       
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sury-deprecate-obsolete-resource-records-01
> Htmlized:       
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-sury-deprecate-obsolete-resource-records
> Diff:           
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-sury-deprecate-obsolete-resource-records-01
> 
> Abstract:
>   This document deprecates Resource Records (RR) Types that are either
>   not being used for anything meaningful or were been already made
>   obsolete by other RFCs.  This document updates [RFC1035], [RFC1035],
>   [RFC4034].
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to