Paul Hoffman wrote: > On May 13, 2019, at 11:06 AM, Ondřej Surý <ond...@isc.org> wrote: > > I still would like to continue with this and I still think it’s a > > no brainer > > It is far from a no-brainer. The implementation of this document will > leave RFC-compliant systems in an unknown state. > > A far easier approach is for any developer to feel free to treat > these RRtypes as unknown RRtypes.
That will work for all record types except those defined in RFC 1035 since name compression in record data is allowed for them. Kind regards, Martin _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
