On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 05:24:33PM +0200, bert hubert wrote: > allow the one remaining closed source DNS implementation
!!!! Really? I'm so pleased we have not only candidate censors of what is going to be published by the WG but also census-takers who have determined then number and types of DNS implemntations in the universe. In case it isn't clear from the above, I am deeply uncomfortable with the entire DNS-police-cum-government latent in this thread. I think interoperability is important and valuable. I do not think that creating a clubhouse of kool kids who decide what "is" a DNS implementation is wise, however. A -- Andrew Sullivan a...@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
