On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 3:46 PM, Tony Finch <d...@dotat.at> wrote:
> bert hubert <bert.hub...@powerdns.com> wrote:
>>
>> Well to allow the one remaining closed source DNS implementation some room,
>
> authoritative services: Akamai Amazon Cloudflare Dyn Google Verisign
> recursive services: Google OpenDNS Quad9
> COTS: Nominum

Those can just as well participate in implementation compatibility
matrices. While open source can make interop testing easier, it is
certainly not a requirement and shouldn't be treated as such.

Kind regards,

Job

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to