On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 3:46 PM, Tony Finch <d...@dotat.at> wrote: > bert hubert <bert.hub...@powerdns.com> wrote: >> >> Well to allow the one remaining closed source DNS implementation some room, > > authoritative services: Akamai Amazon Cloudflare Dyn Google Verisign > recursive services: Google OpenDNS Quad9 > COTS: Nominum
Those can just as well participate in implementation compatibility matrices. While open source can make interop testing easier, it is certainly not a requirement and shouldn't be treated as such. Kind regards, Job _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop