Bert, On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 05:24:33PM +0200, bert hubert wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 08:49:39PM +0530, Mukund Sivaraman wrote: > > I'd raise the bar even higher, to see complete implementation in a major > > open source DNS implementation when it applies. Sometimes implementation > > problems are very revealing (client-subnet should have gone through > > this). > > Well to allow the one remaining closed source DNS implementation some room, > I think we could live with a 'demo' from them if they'd want to. This would > lead to an implementation report, much like is customary in the BGP WGs. > > But otherwise, +100. > > This might go for MIXFR which we are discussing now btw. It looks nice in > theory, but I wonder about the practice, and if the people who want this > (TLD operators I guess) would be willing to test it in simulated production > to see if it fits their needs.
We'll definitely test this on real data with open-source clients and with our own server implementation. > > Bert > Fred _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
