On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 08:49:39PM +0530, Mukund Sivaraman wrote: > I'd raise the bar even higher, to see complete implementation in a major > open source DNS implementation when it applies. Sometimes implementation > problems are very revealing (client-subnet should have gone through > this).
Well to allow the one remaining closed source DNS implementation some room, I think we could live with a 'demo' from them if they'd want to. This would lead to an implementation report, much like is customary in the BGP WGs. But otherwise, +100. This might go for MIXFR which we are discussing now btw. It looks nice in theory, but I wonder about the practice, and if the people who want this (TLD operators I guess) would be willing to test it in simulated production to see if it fits their needs. Bert _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop