An enterprise company with rather large zone which update often are "highly interested" in MIXFR. But we may be the exception rather than the rule.
Tim On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:24 AM, bert hubert <bert.hub...@powerdns.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 08:49:39PM +0530, Mukund Sivaraman wrote: > > I'd raise the bar even higher, to see complete implementation in a major > > open source DNS implementation when it applies. Sometimes implementation > > problems are very revealing (client-subnet should have gone through > > this). > > Well to allow the one remaining closed source DNS implementation some room, > I think we could live with a 'demo' from them if they'd want to. This would > lead to an implementation report, much like is customary in the BGP WGs. > > But otherwise, +100. > > This might go for MIXFR which we are discussing now btw. It looks nice in > theory, but I wonder about the practice, and if the people who want this > (TLD operators I guess) would be willing to test it in simulated production > to see if it fits their needs. > > Bert >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
