> On Apr 7, 2016, at 12:22 PM, Alain Durand <alain.dur...@icann.org> wrote: > > >> On Apr 7, 2016, at 11:17 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr >> <mailto:bortzme...@nic.fr>> wrote: >> >> draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem is full of FUD about how >> ICANN could be pissed off by a decision of the IETF to add > > Stephane, > > That is certainly your right to read it that way, but it is not what the > authors are saying, or at least not what they intended to say. > What draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem is doing is explaining that all > names are subject to socio-economic pressures, > and ICANN has had to develop a complex process to evaluate those pressures > and deal with them. That process may not be perfect, but it exists. > ETF has no such process in place.
It is a matter of scope, to say nothing of opinion, that “all names are subject to socio-economic pressures.” There are a great many identifiers in use on the internet, and it’s hard to even evaluate this claim without some discussion of context. (We spent much of the ARCING BOF on pretty much this point.) Given that discussion of “special use names” is even more likely than most to suffer from assumptions about context, a more precise formulation of this claim would probably be helpful. Suzanne
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
